Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Advent 2009

Advent 2009.

Lectionary Readings:

1st Sunday of Advent

Amos 1:1-5, 13-2:8 1 Thess 5:1-11 Luke 21:5-19

Here we go folks, the first Sunday in Advent.

Introduction to Advent

Today is the first Sunday of Advent. Advent means “coming” and in this season we prepare for the coming of Christ. One of the ways we prepare for his coming is by making an Advent wreath and lighting its candles to remind us of the gifts Christ brings to the world.

The Advent wreath includes many symbols to help us think about Christ and his gifts. The wreath itself is in the shape of a circle. A circle has no beginning and no end. This reminds us that there is no beginning and no end to God and that God’s love and caring are forever.

The light from the candles – which grows stronger each Sunday in Advent, reminds us that Jesus is the light of the world.

Each light represents a particular aspect of life which we are called to reflect upon as we prepare for celebration of the birth of Christ and as we look to his return. We light this candle to remember those who waited in hope for the Messiah. We light one candle and hope that the brightness will grow as we travel through Advent to Christmas.

We light the first candle to remember those who waited in hope for the Messiah. We light one candle and hope that the brightness will grow as we travel through Advent to Christmas.

1st Candle.jpg

Let us hold unswervingly to the hope we profess, for he who promised is faithful.

Let us pray: Thank you God for the hope you give us. We ask that as we wait for all your promises to come true, and for Christ to come again, that you would remain present with us. Help us today, and everyday to worship you, to hear your word, and to do your will by sharing your hope with each other.

We ask it in the name of the one who was born in Bethlehem. Amen.

A Candle is burning, a flame warm and bright,

a candle of hope in December’s dark night.

While angels sing blessing from heaven’s starry sky,

our hearts we prepare now for Jesus is nigh.

Bless each and every person as we ask these things in and through the name of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, Amen

The reading for this morning are not words to make people feel content and cosy. The Amos reading and the Luke reading both speak of a judgement and hardships, but they also conclude with a reward for the true people of God.

We are warned of things to come, trials and persecution to name just two, but we are also reminded that we are not in control of God’s history but we take part in it. I am a controller, I am a planner, but for someone like me it is a real freedom and liberation to know that someone else far greater than I is in control. It means I have responsibilities, but it also means that as long as I have that relationships with God, I along with others can have a peace beyond understanding knowing that God watches over His people and guides us. We are to be expectant, regardless of the date and time of His return.

Mon Nov 30

Amos 2:6-16 2 Peter 1:1-11 Matt 21:1-11

Today’s reading follows a simialr vain to yesterday. We are called out of something to be something else, a people of compassion and community. We are called to encourage and be encouraged by what Jesus has done for us by reflecting him in attitude together. Just like then, we today are doing our own ‘out of Egypt’ journey from an exile into a freedom…. but it isn’t just about my journey, it’s about other people who are at different stages of that same journey (even if they don’t realise it)… it is about a personal and community in holiness…. this song below is about the consumer Christmas that we see every day, but also a responsibility to be salt and light to others….

We are called to think of others and not just of ourselves, that is what being prophetic means. It means not just thinking, not just seeing, but doing. God is an active God amongst His creation.

Jesus, we thank you for Giving up so much, for so many.

We remember where you came from to live amongst us, we remember that you humbled yourself, and you did it willingly and obediantly. Help us to do the same, help us by your Spirit to guide us where you want us to be, and follow the bright light that is You. Just like those people who knew something was special but didn’t fully understand and yet followed you.

We ask that you guide us, and be with us according to your promises, Amen

Advent…

This year has been a strange one, and the last 3-4 months especially have been puzzling, frustrating and yet, out of all that there has been some exceptional moments. My split life continues as I have certain areas of my life story that I can never let the prisoners know, but the strangest thing is that many of them have been inspirational to me in particular.

The prisoners know more about me than most other people do, they have been with me as I prepared for the RAF selection, and they were with me through the initial disappointments of not being accepted. We shall see what happens if there is a 2nd attempt (things are not clear at the moment). These guys are on one heck of a journey, and it is a privilege to be on that journey with them.

So, now we come to Advent 2009, I’m looking forward to this one more so than previously….. we prepare for what is to come, and we take part in God’s creative history. We are coming to the time when something so great was given up and he turned up on the street amongst us! That someone is a person who constantly called me, especially when I wasn’t listening, to be a different me in a relationship that put many things into a different priority. Many other things are in the process of changed as well. This person called Jesus, calls us to do nothing more than follow. To follow regardless, to be obedient and to remember that we don’t change anything on our own, or by plans that include many others. Things change because God is someone who allows mistakes, offers guidance, and we grow as a consequence of the love that provides us with those chances.

I have received a testimony today via Facebook from a person who I have never spoken to. He lives in the States, and his story is a drama that people couldn’t write a script about. If someone did, then it probably would be rejected. Jesus makes those changes possible, only he can make those changes possible.

Tomorrow, we start Advent. The first day of a period where we remember the end and a new beginning about to come. That new beginning is a work in progress…. Come Lord Jesus, come.

Celebrities lead charge against Scientology

Church of Scientology celebrity centre

The exterior of the Church of Scientology Celebrity Centre in Los Angeles in 2003. Photograph: Getty Images

The security at the red-brick and glass-walled horseshoe of the John Joseph Moakley courthouse on Boston’s waterfront was unusually tight. Anybody who was not a member of the city’s bar association was swept with a search wand. Photo IDs were checked. Mobile phones were taken from guests, who included the Hollywood star Tom Cruise.

The occasion was a memorial service for Scientology’s top legal adviser for a quarter of a century, Earle Cooley. The controversial head of Scientology worldwide, David Miscavige, delivered the eulogy, thanking his late friend for his contribution to the neo-religion during his career, much of which was spent pursuing journalists and former members who spoke out against it.

Miscavige may since have wondered privately what Cooley would have made of the events of last week. Scientology, founded in 1953 by the late science fiction pulp novelist, serial fantasist and inveterate self-publicist L Ron Hubbard, is under fire again across the globe, following years of struggle to be recognised – with some success – as a legitimate church.

The church has just been denounced in the strongest possible terms in the Australian parliament. Prime minister Kevin Rudd has expressed his concern over allegations of "a worldwide pattern of abuse and criminality" and is contemplating a parliamentary inquiry. The organisation is under police investigation and yesterday angry ex-Scientologists, spurred on by the claims, converged on its Australian headquarters calling for its tax-exempt status to be revoked.

And it is not only in Australia that Scientology is facing problems. A new book in America – Blown for Good: Behind the Iron Curtain of the Church of Scientology – by Marc Headley, an employee of the church’s Los Angeles headquarters for 15 years, details – as others have – allegations of systematic abuse and bizarre episodes, such as the three weeks Headley claims he spent under instruction from Cruise in how to move bottles and other objects by concentrating on them.

Headley’s book follows a year in which Scientology has been plagued by unwelcome revelations from high-profile defectors and fresh media investigation into its practices.

Last month the church narrowly avoided being banned in France after being prosecuted for fraud, following claims that four leaders – all given suspended jail sentences – had preyed financially on several followers in the 1990s. In Belgium, too, Scientology is embroiled in a long criminal investigation. Perhaps most embarrassing for an organisation that prides itself on its wealthy Hollywood followers, Oscar-winning director Paul Haggis, an adherent of 30 years, abandoned Scientology in October, accusing it of homophobia.

That is not all. Some of the worst damage done to Scientology in the past two years appears to have been self-inflicted. Earlier this year the official spokesman in the US, Tommy Davis, son of the actress Anne Archer, stormed out of an ABC TV interview with Martin Bashir when Bashir had the temerity to ask about one of its central beliefs – relating to an evil intergalactic warlord named Xenu.

More ridicule was invited, unwittingly, by Cruise, the church’s most high-profile member, in a leaked video produced for the organisation last year that went viral on the internet. It showed a rambling Cruise laughing inexplicably while saying that Scientologists were uniquely equipped with the knowledge necessary to cure most of the world’s ills, including crime, drugs, mental health problems and violence.

A religion to some, a business certainly, and a cult to many, whose innermost cadres wear pseudo naval uniforms, Scientology’s religious tenets are a mixture of therapy-style self-improvement steps – at least at first – mixed with a weird space-opera metaphysics, which is revealed only to its highest acolytes. The church has frequently been accused of breaking up families and preying on the vulnerable. The history of Scientology and its critics has been a story played out in the courts in interminable proceedings that supported Cooley’s very lucrative career, underwritten by a very lucrative religious practice in which followers pay large sums of money to progress through a series of training courses called "auditing".

In a quote attributed in the US courts to the late Hubbard himself, it is made clear that the court cases serve a useful purpose, even when they are lost. According to Hubbard, "law can be used very easily to harass… If possible, of course, ruin… entirely."

Scientology has attempted to sue newspapers, including the Washington Post. Time magazine beat off a court claim for $400m after describing the church on its cover as "the Cult of Greed". It has pursued authors, those who have campaigned against it, defectors and rivals. It has also made unsuccessful claims that details of its most secret practices should be regarded as both copyright and a trade secret.

The repeated attempts to use the courts to silence critics have been criticised in the judgments that have been upheld against Scientology, including one in 1996 that described its "documented history of vexatious behaviour" and abuse of "the [US] federal court system by using it, inter alia, to destroy their opponents, rather than to resolve an actual dispute over trademark law or any other legal matter".

So when Nick Xenophon stood up last week in the Australian parliament he was the latest critic in a long line. Xenophon made a carefully calculated decision – to use the protection of parliamentary privilege to denounce an organisation that he claims "abuses its followers, viciously targets its critics and seems largely driven by paranoia". Xenophon’s aim was simple: to challenge the tax-exempt status of Scientology as a religion.

If the allegations Xenophon detailed – including the claims by former high-ranking members that David Miscavige physically assaulted senior Scientologists – were familiar ones to critics of the movement, Xenophon’s speech brought to the widest audience possible a synthesis of the recent and not so recent claims against the leadership of Scientology, allegations picked up worldwide within minutes of him speaking.

He described claims of "false imprisonment, coerced abortions, embezzlement of church funds, physical violence, blackmail and the widespread deliberate abuse of information obtained by the organisation". At the centre of Xenophon’s long, impassioned speech were the allegations of Aaron Saxton, who was "born" into Scientology and "rose to a position of influence in Sydney and the United States".

According to Xenophon, Saxton’s abuse started as a child when his mother was coerced into signing over guardianship of him to the organisation and he was made a security guard at the age of 16. "In 1991 Aaron says he was sent to Scientology headquarters in Florida where he was involved in… putting five individuals under house arrest" and "ordered by superiors to remove documents that would link a Scientology staff member to murder".

"Aaron says women who fell pregnant were taken to offices and bullied to have an abortion. If they refused, they faced demotion and hard labour… Aaron says one staff member used a coat-hanger and self-aborted her child for fear of punishment. He says she was released from the organisation and the files were destroyed."

Saxton also "ordered more than 30 people to be sent to Scientology’s work camps, where they were forced to undertake hard labour", Xenophon said.

He said another former Scientologist, Carmel Underwood, who worked as a financial officer in the organisation and claims to have been assaulted by another member, "witnessed a young girl who had been molested by her father being coached as to what she should say to investigating authorities in order to keep the crimes secret". In a letter described by Xenophon as "one of the saddest correspondences I have received", a father, Paul Schofield, admits to being part of a cover-up of the circumstances surrounding the deaths of his two daughters.

The Church of Scientology in Australia’s response last week was to accuse Xenophon of abusing parliamentary privilege and adding that the allegations were "unquestionably false". "This was not free speech. It was abuse and slander protected by the forms of our parliament," spokesman Cyrus Brooks said in a statement. It did not, however, reply to a series of written questions from the Observer about the cases detailed.

But if something has changed in the past few years, it has been the emergence of an increasingly empowered and vocal global opposition to the Scientologists. The development has been fuelled in part by the internet’s Anonymous movement – which posted the Tom Cruise video to YouTube last year – and has been behind a series of denial-of-service attacks on Scientology websites, protests and prank calls since the Scientologists had it removed it from the site, inevitably claiming copyright infringement. The Australian intervention by Xenophon was part of a wider and growing backlash against one of the world’s most controversial movements.

If there has been a catalyst for many of the Scientologists’ most recent problems it has been provided by a newspaper in Florida – the St Petersburg Times – which covers the area including the organisation’s spiritual headquarters in Clearwater. The paper ran an investigative series featuring interviews with former members of the church’s leadership. These included Marty Rathbun and Mike Rinder, two of the highest-ranking executives to leave Scientology.

According to the two men’s accounts – denounced as "lies" by Miscavige and Tommy Davis – Miscavige routinely assaulted his lieutenants, including Rinder, 50 times. In one article, citing the testimony of four former members, the newspaper described Miscavige administering a vicious beating to another senior church figure, Tom De Vocht. The men described a complex system of internal justice, enforced by security checks and the threat of isolation as a so-called "suppressive person" or SP.

In the interviews the men admitted using violence against other members of the church, often, they claimed, at the behest of Miscavige, also alleging that the church used private information gathered on its members to bully them and force them to do its bidding.

At least some of the recent allegations will be familiar to Jason Beghe, the American actor. Last year he became the first of its celebrity followers – for whom the church maintains a "Celebrity Centre" – to break with it, after giving Scientology more than $1m in donations over 12 years.

These days Beghe prefers to warn that the church is "destructive and a rip-off". He claims that since his renunciation of Scientology he has been pursued to seminars in Europe – held to speak of its dangers – by private investigators employed by Scientology and "disconnected" from former friends who remain within it.

The decision of Beghe and Haggis to quit Scientology appears to have caused the movement its greatest recent PR difficulties, not least because of its dependence on Hollywood figures as both a source of revenue for its most expensive courses and an advertisement for the religion. The involvement of such high-profile figures as Haggis, Cruise and John Travolta has acted as a reassurance for potential recruits against the allegations of its critics.

And while Haggis quit the church over its attitude to gay marriage, his lengthy leaked letter of repudiation of Scientology, written to Davis, included another complaint: that he had lied on television about a key Scientology practice.

Haggis said he had been stunned to see a CNN clip of Davis denying that the church practises a policy of "disconnection" by encouraging members to cut ties with non-members who may disapprove of their beliefs.

"I was shocked," wrote Haggis. "We all know this policy exists. I didn’t have to search for verification – I didn’t have to look any further than my own home." He then detailed how his wife was ordered by the church to disconnect from her parents because they were themselves ex-members.

His wife followed the orders and did not speak to her parents for a year and a half. "That’s not ancient history, Tommy. It was a year ago… To see you lie so easily, I am afraid I had to ask myself: what else are you lying about?"

The answer to that question may now be sought within the context of an Australian parliamentary inquiry. Notoriously litigious and undoubtedly secretive, Scientology is under the microscope again.

After a bad year for Cruise’s church, things could be about to become a whole lot worse.

History of scientology

Founded by L Ron Hubbard (1911-1986), a science-fiction novelist who turned to pulp writing after a wartime military career marked by a number of disgraces. It was while writing for Astounding Science Fiction in 1949 that he published his first article on the subject of dianetics, which would later become Scientology. It was described by one critic as "a lunatic revision of Freudian psychology". His book Dianetics: the Modern Science of Mental Health was published in 1950. Attempts to set up dianetics as a therapeutic practice collapsed.

1952 Having failed to present dianetics as an empirically supported scientific system, Hubbard founded a religion called Scientology, which he claimed was the result of years of research. Using "e-meters" to "measure" the mind, he claimed it could be "cleared" by a process of "auditing". At this point based in England, he ran into problems with the authorities. He founded the Sea Organisation, or the Sea Org, which would become the movement’s central group.

1970 Scientology establishes its celebrity centre in Los Angeles, aiming to attract Hollywood high flyers.

1977 Scientology runs into trouble in the US, this time for domestic espionage against the federal government, for which Hubbard’s wife and a dozen other officials were convicted of conspiracy.

1986 Hubbard dies of a stroke in California.

1993 Scientology is declared tax-exempt as a church in the US, ending a 40-year battle.

1999 Refused tax-exempt status by the UK charity commission, which rules it is not a religion. However, in the years that follow it is recognised as a religion in a number of countries, including Sweden, New Zealand and Portugal.

2006 A repeat of a South Park episode that spoofs Tom Cruise and Scientology is pulled from the air.

2009 The church is found guilty of fraud in France. Screenwriter Paul Haggis splits with Scientology amid accusations of homophobia. Tom Cruise and John Travolta are still members of the Church of Scientology.

• This article was amended on Thursday 26 Novemeber 2009. We said that the St Petersburg Times was in Tampa, Florida, which is one of the areas it covers but is not where it is based. This has been corrected.

http://aavey.wordpress.com/2008/12/26/my-ba-hons-dissertation/dissertation-final-copy/

Above is the link to my BA Dissertation on Capital Punishment..

I posted it a while back, but I want to encourage others thoughts and discussion on the subject. A subject that rears it’s ugly head every so often.

The benefits of state privilege eventually crack. This is a vital time, not a time of doom and gloom, but a time of rediscovery of meaning and praxis. It needs to go through another reformation….

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article6935618.ece

Ruth Gledhill and Tim Glanfield

Anglican bishops in front of Canterbury Cathedral

The Church of England is facing the loss of as many as one in ten paid clergy in the next five years and internal documents seen by The Times admit that the traditional model of a vicar in every parish is over.

The credit crunch and a pension funding crisis have left dioceses facing massive restructuring programmes. Church statistics show that between 2000 and 2013 stipendiary or paid clergy numbers will have fallen by nearly a quarter.

According to figures on the Church of England website, there will be an 8.3 per cent decrease in paid clergy in the next four years, from 8,400 this year to 7,700 in to 2013. This represents a 22.5 per cent decrease since 2000. If this trend continues in just over 50 years there will be no full-time paid clergy left in Britain’s 13,000 parishes serving 16,000 churches.

Jobs will instead be filled by unpaid part-timers, giving rise to fears about the quality of parish ministry. Combined with a big reduction in churchgoing, the figures will add weight to the campaign for disestablishment.

RELATED LINKS

Nine meetings with bishops, diocesan and cathedral staff were held in London this summer to discuss the crisis. A Church report on the meetings released yesterday to The Times describes the traditional model of a stipendiary vicar in every parish as “broken in much of the country”.

This week the Archbishops’ Council approved a plan to make Anglican clergy work until the age of 68 to help to save the Church from its multimillion-pound pensions shortfall.

Increased life expectancy, combined with greater regulation and the credit crunch, has left the Church’s pension scheme with liabilities of £813 million, almost double the £461 million market value of its assets.

The scheme, created in 1998 and partly funded by churchgoers who are being asked to put more in the collection pot than ever before, has been especially hard hit because all of its investments were placed in the stock market at the end of the 1990s.

One diocese that is particularly struggling is Winchester, where a meeting of the diocesan synod this morning will discuss proposals to cut clergy posts to save £1 million.

In Littlebourne, in the Arcbhishop of Canterbury’s diocese in Canterbury, a benefice that contributes more than £50,000 is protesting at being told that it can have only an unpaid, part-time priest.In a new pattern of ministry mirrored throughout the country the benefice is to be placed in a “cluster” with a neighbouring benefice and will share the neighbour’s stipendiary priest.

A spokesperson for the Diocese of Oxford told The Times: “We have been reducing the number of clergy for a number of years. We are a big diocese and don’t want to take more than our fair share — that’s happening right across the church.”

Even in the wealthy diocese of Salisbury, where there is a projected budget increase of 1.8 per cent, the 214 full-time stipendiary clergy in 2008 are to be cut to 203 by 2016.

The Rev David Houlding, the chairman of clergy in the London diocese, said: “The bottom line is that the money which pays for the Church comes from people in the pew. The income of the Church of England is seriously threatened at the moment because people do not have the money because of the credit crunch.”

About one in sixty people worships with the Church of England on an average Sunday. This is projected to drop to less than one in 600 by 2050. The average age of a British Anglican worshipper was 37 in 1980, but is expected to rise to 67 by 2050.

Terry Sanderson, of the National Secular Society, said: “Such numbers remove the last vestige of justification for the Church’s establishment. It is no longer representative of the nation and will become progressively less able to fulfil its claimed nationwide service.

“Establishment gives bishops significant power and this is simply illegitimate and undemocratic. It is quite clear that the Church of England is, to all extents and purposes, finished.”

A Church of England spokesman said: “It’s nice to have ‘our’ vicar and ‘our church’. However, most people recognise that this is not the situation.” The cut in clergy was not related to money but to vocations. “The bigger pressure is the really quite encouraging number of ordinations is not as big as the number of those retiring.”

Gary McKinnon, Asperger Syndrome, obsession with UFOs, and the wounded pride of Empire

by Jim Gordon

Update, November 28, 2009.

The most recent decision by the Home Secretary to allow the extradition of Gary Mackinnon to the United States is not surprising. The absence of ethical content and responsible moral control in the decisions of the current government, its wholesale capitulation to the demands of the United States that US security concerns give carte blanche for political and military pressures, and that country’s now expedient assertions about the importance of international law, come together against the ironic and morally tragic exposure of US and UK complicity that now forces seasoned diplomats, facing public enquiry, to openly question the legality and legitimacy of the war in Iraq.

I have little to add to the reflections I offered in August. Except this. I am ashamed of the failure of the UK government to protect its own citizen. I am ashamed of the lack of moral courage and legal wisdom on the part of the Home Secretary and the Government which, if they are now over a barrel because of a bad law, were the very Government that drove through its approval. Either way, Gary Mackinnon should not be the one to bear the cost of ill conceived legislation enacted by a supine legislature administered by a domesticated administration.

Gary Mackinnon’s mother asks the right question – if her son’s Asperger’s condition and his current distress, which no one denies, do not constitute a fundamental threat to his well-being such that it compromises his human rights, then what in fact does? “How does a British citizen claim asylum in his own country?” is one of those twisted legal questions that exposes the nonsense of the Home Secretary’s position. Rightly, this country does not send people away if they face a credible theat of serious harm abroad. We have had no medical report published by the Home Office indicating Gary Mackinnon’s health will withstand the trauma of extradition. The impact of edxtradition, trial and sentence on a person with autism whose sense of self and the world is so fundamentally different, is so obviously severe that it would rightly be called inhumane. At which point I want to repeat here my post from August 1, and stand by each word of it.

…………………………………………………..

Disquiet. Unease.
A persistent mood of ethical anxiety.
Discomfort like toothache of the conscience.
Awakening suspicion that something is wrong.
Hard to place and hard to ignore anger.
An inner resistance to saying nothing.

  1. No one denies that Gary McKinnon hacked into US computerised defence systems.
  2. Computer hacking is bad enough. But to compromise high level national security systems is by any standards a matter of serious concern. In most cases it is also a matter of criminal intent and is rightly treated as such by the relevant legal and judicial systems. (Perhaps the vulnerability of such high level computer systems to attack from an amateur UFO researcher in the UK raises questions of incompetence or negligence which are themselves definable as criminal).
  3. Extradition is an important legal process of national co-operation and of reciprocal help between nations in ensuring that it isn’t possible for people to escape justice by virtue of living in another country. But for a nation to give up its citizens to another such laws need to be secure, fair, reciprocal and reviewable to avoid anomalies and injustice.
  4. National security is the top of the agenda concern for the Unitred States for reasons that are obvious; the 9/11 attack and the determination to secure again the safety of the homeland, and as its inevitable corollary, the widespread hostility to the US and the UK amongst many Muslim countries and communities, many of the radicalised, following the Afghanistan and Iraq invasions by US and UK troops backed by other non Muslim nations.

So for Gary McKinnon to breach the supposedly elaborate security hardware and software of the Pentagon and other defence facilities, with their lauded military standard fail-safe systems, at such a sensitive time, raises questions that are both worrying and embarrassing for the United States and its global reputation. Somebody needs to pay.

20090730220699647572317Add now to these observations the equally undisputed fact that Gary McKinnon is a person with Asperger syndrome, obsessive about UFOs, and that his patterns of behaviour are classic expressions of a condition that essentially defines his way of relating to the world. Then ask what questions this raises about the legal and moral implications of a decision to extradite him to the United States, to stand trial for actions he does not deny, but which are explained by a pre-existing condition that is by definition related to compulsive behavioural patterns, and when the likeliest outcome is an inevitable and long jail sentence.

And this because the UK has a treaty with the United States intended to ensure co-operation in dealing with serious crime and terrorist threats, but which was intended for people with ambitions to kill, not persons with an autistic spectrum disorder. Add to this that UK Judges, charged with upholding the law, while acknowledging the severe impact of extradition on this man’s mental health, which they themselves admit may be life-threatening, suggest nevertheless it would not be a breach of his human rights to extradite him to the United States. I find it profoundly ironic that Judges appointed to uphold law, including international and human rights law, take at face value “assurances of appropriate care”, on the very same day it is reported that evidence about whether or not the CIA and british Intelligence knew of or were involved, directly or indirectly, in the mistreatment and alleged torture of a British citizen, could not be heard in a UK court, on the direct intervention of Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State. Human rights indeed! I am not reassured by the cynical ambiguity of the term “appropriate care” for someone who has so embarrassed the might of the United States, and whom the US sees as a continuing security threat.

I’m not arguing that Gary McKinnon should not face up to the consequences of what he did. He himself recognises that. But given his condition, there are issues of justice here that are deeper than the desire to put on trial, convict, sentence and make the public power statement that seems to be so important to the US authorities pursuing this extradition. The law is not there to serve the political interests of Empire, as instruments of power at the disposal of the state. Justice fundamentally involves using just laws justly, and for the purposes they were intended. Justice, and therefore moral and legal accountability, takes into consideration a person’s capacities, intentions and ability to recognise how personal acts have social consequences. The proper administration of justice requires the law to take into account the reality of a person’s medical condition and the impact of that condition, in this case autism, on a person’s recognition of boundaries and the overall context of their actions – or why not arrest and try persons with Tourette syndrome for using obscene language in public space? As David Cameron said yesterday, in the application of law, justice is not incompatible with compassion in our ways of dealing with people. That is particularly important in a world where compassion now seems to be massively discounted, and hard edged “justice” understood as legal retribution is considered a high value virtue. Mercy does not undermine law, it enhances its authority, demonstrates its value to the community, and quality assures its expression for the public good.

What I miss in the judgement of the judges, and in the reiterated refusal of the Home Secretary to allow a trial in the UK, is the moral courage to discern more deeply, the mature wisdom to decide more humanely, and thus to raise our respect for the law as that which serves us fairly and well. Under this present Government, for all its hyped up claims about making our country more secure, our own citizens are considerably less safe. In the political and cultural background, can be heard the remorseless grind of the machinery of Empire, armoured and determined that those who threaten it will feel the full force of the law. Even when a particular law is badly framed, inadequately qualified and increasingly recognised as open to political manipulation.

That’s why I’m suffering from

Disquiet. Unease.
A persistent mood of ethical anxiety.
Discomfort like toothache of the conscience.
Awakening suspicion that something is wrong.
Hard to place and hard to ignore anger.
An inner resistance to saying nothing.

I have posted in various places articles relating to the below disgrace. The article below highlights power and authority, the consequences of such structures and also the refusal to be accountable to anyone other than themselves…..

Dublin Abuse Report and the Catholic Herald

by Augustine of Canterbury Dublin Abuse Report and the Catholic Herald

cv.JPG

The report from the investigation into the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Dublin is a truly shocking read. One priest abused over 100 children, 46 priests were investigated in the report. What is perhaps even more shocking is that all of this was hushed up by the Irish state and Roman Catholic Church who were more interested in the reputation of the church than justice for the victims. Indeed it would appear that the authoritarian structure of Irish Roman Catholic Church meant that the abuse was kept out of the public eye for many years.

The lesson to be learnt;- authoritarian structures like to keep problems, failures and abuses quiet because they don’t like to face tough questions from outside. Authoritarian structures just can’t handle internal or external criticism. Open structures tend to keep the discipline of explaining to the wider world their problems and failures and are less likely to hide abuse. Authorities structures can look good but be rotten underneath; open structures can look chaotic but are hiding nothing, what you see is what you get.

Let those with ears to hear understand ………

And talking of keeping quiet;- the Dublin Abuse report is a major piece of international news, a major church news story and yet Damian Thompson has tweeted on every other subject today except Dublin and the Catholic Herald silent on the issue. Apparently it’s fine to heavily criticise Rowan Williams and the Church of England, at length on every possible occasion and it’s fine to report every small piece of non-news from Rome in triumphalist terms, but when it comes to admitting that everything isn’t perfect in the Roman Catholic Church they have absolutely nothing to say. Shame on you.

Man crushed to death in bin named

Stefan Tomkins Mr Tomkins was asphyxiated, a post-mortem examination revealed

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/8382857.stm

A homeless man who was crushed to death by a refuse lorry in Manchester has been identified.

Stefan Tomkins, 31, is thought to have climbed into the industrial bin to escape the rain on Tuesday night.

His body was found when the vehicle emptied its load at a rubbish site in Ardwick on Wednesday morning.

Greater Manchester Police are urging homeless people to avoid sleeping in refuse containers to avoid a similar tragic accident.

A post-mortem examination revealed Mr Tomkins died from asphyxiation as he was crushed with the rubbish.

The incident is not being treated as suspicious and police have passed the case to the coroner.

Advent – Google Wave

I was very cheeky last week, I asked someone thousands of miles away to send me a Google Wave invite if she had any spare…. and as a good advertisement for Twitter I did the necessary and received an invite which was activated by me very quickly.

Why Google Wave? Well, I have invited some good friends in the past to participate in blogs with me, they have initially said ‘yes’, but as yo can imaging, Pastors lead busy lives. So nothing ever came of the collaboration attempts. I invited my original source of Wave (Karen) to take part in an Advent Wave a few days ago. She thought about it and said yes, so the first big idea is actually a very big idea to keep going… I have gone to the Lectionary and listed all the reading throughout Advent, with the hope that we (along with others) can add daily a devotional piece. I have set very few boundaries other than it can be anything… thoughts, prayers, media… all to help in the preparation of Christ coming into the world.

I have looked at a couple of blogs that have done the same, but they have been a single input for each day (and added comments etc), whereas this I hope will be a daily building up of preparation that all can read and take part in…. I am hoping to publish each day those pieces on this blog for everyone else to see and comment (please do).

So, at the moment I have sent a few Wave invites hoping that they shall receive them in time. If not, then they can enter as and when. I am looking forward to it, it certainly is a commitment, and may develop into something or not. If it doesn’t – fine….. if it does – fine.

http://www.cofe.anglican.org/news/pr11109.html

Secondary schools with a religious foundation contribute significantly and substantially more to the promotion of community cohesion and the provision of equality of opportunity for students than other schools, according to the results of an academic study of recent Ofsted inspection data.

Analysis of the sample of independent inspection reports suggests that secondary-level ‘faith schools’ (of all faiths and denominations, taken as a group) received average grades more than 11 per cent higher than ‘community schools’ for their promotion of community cohesion, and outperformed such schools by almost nine per cent for their effectiveness in tackling inequality.

The research, by a recognised expert on the evaluation of school performance, is published today alongside a set of case studies of Church of England schools which have pioneered programmes that reach out well beyond the school gates to help foster good relations across their local community.

Since September 2008, the schools inspectorate has assessed schools on their effectiveness in promoting community cohesion and the extent to which they support equality of opportunity and tackle discrimination.

A study by Professor David Jesson of the University of York, commissioned by the Church of England, looked at the reports of 400 secondary schools inspected between March and June 2009 and 700 primary schools inspected in June this year.

The data for primary schools, serving relatively small cohorts of pupils, suggested faith schools perform just as well as community schools based on the average grade received for promoting community cohesion. Grades are awarded on a scale of 1 (outstanding) to 4 (inadequate), with both types of school averaging 2.2 at primary level.

However, the data for secondary schools indicates “clear evidence that Faith schools were awarded substantially higher inspection gradings for promoting community cohesion than Community schools,” according to Professor Jesson. The data shows that the mean average of grades given to secondary schools with a religious foundation is 1.86, compared to 2.31 for community schools.

In his research paper, Professor Jesson comments: “This finding is particularly relevant to the debate about schools’ contribution to community cohesion – and runs completely counter to those who have argued that because faith schools have a distinctive culture reflecting their faith orientation and are responsible for their admissions that they are ‘divisive’ and so contribute to greater segregation amongst their communities. This is clearly not supported by this most recent Ofsted inspection evidence.”

In reaching their judgements on a school’s performance in promoting community cohesion, Ofsted’s inspectors look for evidence that schools have undertaken an analysis of their school population and locality and then created an action plan focused on engaging with under-represented groups outside the school and between different groups within the school itself.

Ofsted also looks for evidence that schools have strategies for promoting participation by learners in all the opportunities that the school provides and strategies for tackling any discriminatory behaviour between groups of learners. Comparing the data on grades awarded for this part of the inspection between different types of secondary school, Professor Jesson writes: “Here again the contrast between Faith schools and Community schools is clear. Faith schools achieve higher gradings on this aspect of their contribution to their pupils and their community.” Community schools received a mean average of 2.03, while schools with a religious foundation received a higher average of 1.68.

The Revd Janina Ainsworth, Chief Education Officer for the Church of England, comments in her introduction to the report: “Schools with a religious foundation have a particular role in modelling how faith and belief can be explored and expressed in ways that bring communities together rather than driving them apart. They can minimise the risks of isolating communities for whom religious belief and practice are core parts of their identity and behaviour. In Church of England schools that means taking all faith seriously and placing a high premium on dialogue, seeking the common ground as well as understanding and respecting difference.

“Schools contribute most actively towards nurturing a shared sense of belonging across communities when they are clear about their own distinctive values and how that grounds their engagement with other groups at local, national and global levels. Promoting community cohesion is not about diluting what we believe to create a pallid mush of ‘niceness’.

“Our Christian foundation places the strongest obligation onto Church of England schools to help children form relationships of mutual care and affection with people from every creed and background. For church schools, community cohesion is more than ticking a box for the government. It is about acting out the values articulated in the school’s mission statement in ways that serve and strengthen our human relationship with our neighbours.”

The report, Strong schools for strong communities: Reviewing the impact of Church of England schools in promoting community cohesion, is available for download here.

Older Posts »